Letter #3908
[Ioannes DANTISCUS] to Stanisław HOZJUSZ (HOSIUS)Braunsberg (Braniewo), 1545-01-29
English register:
Dantiscus thanks the addressee for his letters sent along with the copies [of letters and writs of summons for the city of Gdańsk (Danzig)], to which he already partially replied in his letter of 9 January sent by way of Mauritius, whose return he expects within the coming hours. He learned with satisfaction from Hozjusz’s letter that the syndic [of the city of Gdańsk, Konrad Lagus] had obtained nothing beyond a copy of the document and that he did not succeed in obtaining a hearing date for the appeal [in the matter of the recovery of Putzig (Puck]. Constellatus [Johann von Werden] and the city councillors of Gdańsk will not be pleased by this. According to the copy of the lawsuit, it is the council [of the city of Gdańsk] that has been named as defendant, and therefore, on the basis of the formula contained therein, it would be possible to compel it to respond to all the charges, including those concerning the powers assumed by the city as legal successor to the Commander [of the Teutonic Order] and those bearing on the king’s [Sigismund I Jagiellon’s] title of ownership. The king can summon the specific individuals named in the document to appear before him at any time. Dantiscus hopes to speak about this matter at greater length in a personal meeting, as well as about others that need to be addressed in writing.
Dantiscus asks for arrangements to be made with the commissioner [Marco de la Torre, Commissioner General of the Conventual Franciscans] regarding Dantiscus lodging [with him in Cracow (Kraków)]. He likewise requests that his arrival be kept in confidence, which he wishes to maintain for reasons of considerable importance.
He was pleased with the response given by the addressee to the person who had sought counsel as to how the city of Gdańsk might be reconciled with the king. As to the advice on this matter, Dantiscus has written about it recently in a letter to Hozjusz or, if he recalls correctly, to Samuel Maciejowski. It will prove beneficial if the king treats the matter with due seriousness. Should he proceed as before, however, [the text is partially damaged beyond this point].
Dantiscus raises the matter of the emperor’s [Charles V] letter [concerning Gdańsk’s subordination to the Empire]. [The text is unclear and partially damaged at this point]. The declaration of the citizens of Gdańsk that the emperor is their true lord, and the king is zum schuchhernn will be understood by anyone capable of playing the part of Oedipus [i.e. capable of solving riddles].
Dantiscus responds to the addressee’s comment that he is needed [at the General Diet, as there is no-one better acquainted with Prussian affairs than he is], dismissing it as mere courtesy. He assures him, nonetheless, that he will attend to fulfil his duties to his sovereign, albeit at considerable financial cost and great personal effort to himself.
In Elbing (Elbląg), Dantiscus and others [i.e. the other members of the council of Royal Prussia] have recently settled a number of legal cases. As for the orphan in his care [Georg Schultz], his right of appeal before the king has been reinstated, the same right having been neglected by his guardians. The date of the proceedings has been set for the first court day following the feast of Saint John the Baptist [24 June 1545]. Cornelius [von Stadenn] and his wife, and his adversary [Petrus Brandt] have undertaken to reach an agreement privately before the spring Diet [of Royal Prussia].
Dantiscus will write on other matters upon Mauritius’ return, whereupon he will dispatch him to return without delay.
As this point, nothing is known about the subject of the deliberations between the neighbour [Duke Albrecht I von Hohenzollern], his brother-in-law [Adolf, Duke of Holstein-Gottorp] and his nephew [Albrecht Alcibiades]. Constellatus [Johann von Werden] departed thither [to Königsberg] some days ago and is reported to be there still.
In a postscript, Dantiscus asks for news from the court. He wishes to know whether the neighbour [Duke Albrecht I von Hohenzollern] will give notice of having received his guests, whether by envoy or by letter. Besides, he is interested in the activities of Constellatus [Johann von Werden] and the progress of the General Diet. Rumours are circulating that Constellatus, together with the neighbour and his guests, is dealing with the question of the marriages of the royal princesses [Zofia, Anna, and Catherine Jagiellon], and that preparations are under way for a journey to the court together with the brother-in-law [Adolf, Duke of Holstein-Gottorp]. The latter is reportedly a frivolous man, a lover of foolery and a drunkard. He has received one third of the Duchy of Holstein. The man who styles himself King of Denmark [Christian III of Oldenburg] and his other brother [John, Duke of Holstein-Gottorp] hold the remaining two, more favourable, parts of the duchy. Dantiscus asks for information on the matters raised, as well as on others, so that he may arrive at court well prepared.
Manuscript sources:
| ||||||
Text & apparatus & commentary Plain text Text & commentary Text & apparatus Excerpts concerning Dantiscus' travels
Doctori Hosio
Venerabilis etc.
Gratissimae mihi fuerunt cum exemplis missis Dominationis Vestrae litterae, quibus iam aliqua ex parte IX huius per Mauritium, cuius written over re⌈re cuius cuius written over re⌉ reditum in horas exspecto, respondi. Quod syndicus nihil aliud obtinuerit, quam quod scheda exempli habuit et quod frustratus sit in termino, quem legibus suis se extersurum putabat et de se pollicebatur, libenter legi. Non item libenter hoc Constellatus cum suis audiet. In hac una missa citatione citatus written over i⌈iusus written over i⌉ est sunt magistratus, u written over e⌈euu written over e⌉t etiam ad omnia alia obiicienda respondeat. Poterit igitur de commendatoria et aliis negotiis in rem regiam huius vigore agi. De Notato written over i⌈ioo written over i⌉s in scheda quovis tempore serenissima maiestas regia advocare potest. Sed de iis et aliis, quae scribenda essent, Deo bene favente, coram latius.
Dominatio Vestra pro sua in me benevolentia agat interea cum reverendo domino commissario tractet pro hospitio et de adventu meo non omnibus significationem faciat, velim enim exitum meum hinc ad vos, quantum fieri potest, non ob leves causas servari secretius.
Responsum Dominationis Vestrae, quod illi dedit, qui written over a⌈aii written over a⌉ consilium petivit, qua in re maiestas regia ob rebellionem posset reddi placatior, non vulgariter placuit. Quid hic in eo consilii datum est, scripsi novissime Dominationi Vestrae, vel, si recte memini, domino reverendissimo. Si maiestas regia, ut cepit, nego causam hanc serio pertractabit, erit maxime ex dignitate et commodo eius maiestatis. Sin vero sic agetur ut prius, eum citatis non [...] paper damaged⌈[...][...] paper damaged⌉ a paper damaged⌈[a]a paper damaged⌉ntea scripsi, q(uo)d or q(ui)d⌈q(uo)dq(uo)d or q(ui)d⌉ [...] paper damaged⌈[...][...] paper damaged⌉.
Quod de litteris imperatoris paper damaged⌈[atoris]atoris paper damaged⌉ [...] paper damaged⌈[...][...] paper damaged⌉ vanus rumor ad me(?) [...] paper damaged⌈[...][...] paper damaged⌉dia, ea de re paul[...] paper damaged⌈[...][...] paper damaged⌉, qui dicebat se ... ona[...] or a(n)i(m)a[...]⌈ona[...] paper damaged⌈[...][...] paper damaged⌉... ona[...] or a(n)i(m)a[...]⌉ [...] paper damaged⌈[...][...] paper damaged⌉ illos in hac insinui [...] paper damaged⌈[...][...] paper damaged⌉num tamen [...] paper damaged⌈[...][...] paper damaged⌉ et publice a quibusdam paper damaged⌈[m]m paper damaged⌉ [...] paper damaged⌈[...][...] paper damaged⌉ sunt quod caesarem esse paper damaged⌈[arem esse]arem esse paper damaged⌉ eorum paper damaged⌈[orum]orum paper damaged⌉ verum dominum, regem vero (ut e paper damaged⌈[t e]t e paper damaged⌉orum verbis utar) u[...] paper damaged⌈[...][...] paper damaged⌉i zum schuchhern(n). Quid sibi ista velint, quivis Oedipus esse potest.
Ceterum, ut scribit Dominatio Vestra in iis persona mea opus esse, multa mihi pro sua benevolentia mihi tribuens, quae in me non agnosco hidden by binding⌈[co]co hidden by binding⌉, nescio, quid a me praestari possit, quod non posset vel obiter aliquis. Nihilosecius, quicquid in me est, principi meo written over nostro⌈nostro meo meo written over nostro⌉ debeo, immo et meipsum, venturus sum igitur, licet pro tenuitate hidden by binding⌈[ate]ate hidden by binding⌉ mea id sine meo dispendio et magna molestia id fieri no[n] queat or nequeat⌈non hidden by binding⌈[n]n hidden by binding⌉ queatno[n] queat or nequeat⌉, divinae me committens voluntati, sine qua ne folium quidem ab arbore decidit etc.
Elbingi nuper multas causas absolvimus. Pupillus meus restitutus est in integrum appellationis ad maiestatem regiam, quam tutores deseruerant; prosecutionis terminus praefixus est ad primum diem iuridicum post sancti Ioannis Baptistae festum aestivum. Cornelius cum coniuge et eius adversarius in causa hac inso hidden by binding⌈[o]o hidden by binding⌉lenti et prius numquam apud nos audita, ut secreto superinscribed⌈secretosecreto superinscribed⌉ inter se componant ante vernum conventum, est remissionem adscribed in place of crossed-out us⌈usionemionem adscribed in place of crossed-out us⌉ susceperunt. A paucis est appella(n)dum hidden by binding⌈[dum]dum hidden by binding⌉,
AAWO, AB, D. 7, f. 11r meo iudicio temere quidem etc.
Alia, quae hinc sunt scribenda sunt paper damaged⌈[enda sunt]enda sunt paper damaged⌉, post reditum Mauritii, quem evestigio remittam, Dominatio Vestra accipiet paper damaged⌈[ccipiet]ccipiet paper damaged⌉.
Quid cum hospitibus sororio et nepote on the margin⌈sororio et nepotesororio et nepote on the margin⌉ vicinus tractet, sciri sciri adhuc nequit. paper damaged⌈[t.]t. paper damaged⌉ Con paper damaged⌈[Con]Con paper damaged⌉stellatus se etiam ante paucos dies eo contulerat et ... illegible⌈...... illegible⌉ ibidem paper damaged⌈[dem]dem paper damaged⌉(?) id paper damaged⌈[id]id paper damaged⌉ temporis iterum esse fertur. Quicquid in iis superinscribed⌈in iisin iis superinscribed⌉ compertum habuero et in novis paper damaged⌈[is]is paper damaged⌉ habuero, Dominationem Vestram non celabo. Quam felicissime valere opto etc. hidden by binding⌈[tc.]tc. hidden by binding⌉(?)
Braunsberg, XXIX Ianuarii MDXLV.
Postscript:
Si quid interea erit, quod me ex aula scire oporteat, praesertim si vicinus vel nuntio seu litteris de hospitibus suis significaverit maiestati regiae quippiam et de Constellato ac moliminibus eius si quid Dominatio Vestra acceperit atque de novis, quae in hoc comitiorum initio se offerent, ut me Dominatio Vestra reddat certiorem, rogo plurimum. Auditur hic, quod Constellatus cum vicino et hospitibus nescio quae matrimonia nostrarum reginularum in incude habeant et quod profectio ad vos cum magno apparatu sororii vicini struitur. Qui homo esse fertur levitatis et scurrilitatis amator et potor egregius, et quod in divisione ducatus Holsatiae tertiam dumtaxat partem est assecutus. Ille, qui se pro Daniae rege gerit, cum alio fratre habent inter se superinscribed, in the hand of Dantiscus⌈sese superinscribed, in the hand of Dantiscus⌉ duas et potiores etc. De iis, et quicquid Dominatio Vestra habuerit aliud, me, rogo, cum primis Dominatio Vestra edoceat, ut instructior de omnibus hic inquirendis ad vos venire possim[1] etc.
[1 ] possim an excess cane at the end of the word