Letter #56
[Ioannes DANTISCUS] to [Samuel MACIEJOWSKI]s.l., [shortly after 1544-09-25]
English register:
He has recently outlined his position in a letter from Marienburg (Malbork) together with the Castellan of Elbing (Elbląg), Stanisław Kostka, following the conclusion of his work on the royal commission concerning [the recovery of] the town of Putzig (Puck) [by Sigismund I]. He has no idea what better counsel he might offer. He did not raise this matter in his letter to the king as he was aware that the current primate bishop [Piotr Gamrat] will be present at its reading, a man entirely devoted to Constellatus [Johann von Werden]. If the said disobedience goes unpunished, which in his view it will, he will be freed of many thoughts that occur to him regarding the king’s matter. Other thoughts will occur to him if he sees any respect for the king, let alone for the Crown Council, entirely extinguished among our people [the inhabitants of Royal Prussia], a state of affairs which the addressee has himself had occasion to observe in recent times. Should a more lenient penalty be determined, Ioannes Dantiscus favours a fine of ten thousand florins. Should possession [of the town] be maintained by force, however, it will be necessary likewise to recover it by force. He considers that those appointed to the Diet of the Kingdom of Poland ought to be summoned together with Constellatus [Werden], as he has previously written to the Castellan of Elbing (Elbląg) [Stanisław Kostka]. Should they fail to appear, appropriate measures will need to be taken.
Dantiscus awaits the arrival of [Peter Papuschka]. He requests that the addressee inform him and Papuschka of any news which the imperial envoy [Alfonso d'Aragona] has brought concerning his fellow countrymen [the inhabitants of Gdańsk (Danzig)]. By this means one may learn many things that might prove useful in time.
Dantiscus asks for instructions as to what the king wishes he should do with the document pertaining to the town of Gdańsk and concerning the six thousand florins left in his keeping by the commissioners [appointed for the recovery of the estate of Puck by Sigismund I, namely Jan Sokołowski, Johann von Baysen (Jan Bażyński) and Paweł Płotowski]. The document has been seized in the king's name by the Castellan of Elbing. In Gdańsk, complaints are being made against Dantiscus to the effect that he seized the document by force. This view has been disseminated among the common people, who heap curses upon him.
Manuscript sources:
| ||||||
Text & apparatus & commentary Plain text Text & commentary Text & apparatus
Postscript No. 1:
Reverendissime mi Domine.
Consilium meum cum generoso domino
Exspecto cupidissime
Postscript No. 2:
Quid cum litteris
AAWO, AB, D. 70, f. 22r