Iniunximus generoso Stanisław Kostka (*1487 – †1555), as a leader of the so-called nobles' party active in Royal Prussia since 1536, Kostka stood in opposition to most of the members of the Council of Royal Prussia, who wanted to maintain the autonomy of the province and a "balance of power" in terms of governance. The tension between the Prussian Subtreasurer and the Council had been increasing since the Diet in Graudenz (Grudziądz) in 1533. Kostka, connected with the royal court since his youth, was sent to Graudenz as the King's deputy and, contrary to custom, decided to take part in the proceedings. In response to such a step, the Council members stopped the meeting. Kostka accused them of hostility towards the Poles and intervened on this matter at the court. In the absence of the then Bishop of Ermland (Mauritius Ferber) it was Dantiscus who chaired the Graudenz Diet. The incident badly harmed his future relationships with Kostka; 1531-1555 Treasurer of the Prussian lands and Treasurer of Marienburg (Malbork); 1544-1545 Castellan of Elbing (Elbląg), 1545-1546 Castellan of Kulm (Chełmno); 1546-1549 Vice-Voivode of Kulm; 1546-1551 Voivode of Pomerania; 1551-1555 Voivode of Kulm (PSB 14, p. 356; Urzędnicy 5/2, p. 216; MAŁŁEK 1976, p. 119-123)⌊Stanislao KostkaStanisław Kostka (*1487 – †1555), as a leader of the so-called nobles' party active in Royal Prussia since 1536, Kostka stood in opposition to most of the members of the Council of Royal Prussia, who wanted to maintain the autonomy of the province and a "balance of power" in terms of governance. The tension between the Prussian Subtreasurer and the Council had been increasing since the Diet in Graudenz (Grudziądz) in 1533. Kostka, connected with the royal court since his youth, was sent to Graudenz as the King's deputy and, contrary to custom, decided to take part in the proceedings. In response to such a step, the Council members stopped the meeting. Kostka accused them of hostility towards the Poles and intervened on this matter at the court. In the absence of the then Bishop of Ermland (Mauritius Ferber) it was Dantiscus who chaired the Graudenz Diet. The incident badly harmed his future relationships with Kostka; 1531-1555 Treasurer of the Prussian lands and Treasurer of Marienburg (Malbork); 1544-1545 Castellan of Elbing (Elbląg), 1545-1546 Castellan of Kulm (Chełmno); 1546-1549 Vice-Voivode of Kulm; 1546-1551 Voivode of Pomerania; 1551-1555 Voivode of Kulm (PSB 14, p. 356; Urzędnicy 5/2, p. 216; MAŁŁEK 1976, p. 119-123)⌋, thesaurario nostro Mariemburgensi, ut villas nostras
Libenau (Lignowy), village in northern Poland, Pomerania, 18 km SW of Marienburg, today Lignowy Szlacheckie⌊LibenawLibenau (Lignowy), village in northern Poland, Pomerania, 18 km SW of Marienburg, today Lignowy Szlacheckie⌋ et Rauden⌊RawdenRauden⌋ pro mensa nostra pecuniis nostris de manibus tenutariorum redimat, prout iam in possessionem dictorum bonorum per commissarios nostros positus est. Quia vero suborta est controversia quaedam de florenorum Ungaricalium aestimatione et valore, ideo volentes huiusmodi controversiae debitum finem imponere, vobis, de quorum prudentia et probitate confidimus, committimus, ut vocatis ad vestri praesentiam partibus vocandis et conspectis diligenter tenoribus litterarum super praefatis bonis legitime emanatarum, summas pecuniarum in eisdem litteris descriptas a praefato Stanisław Kostka (*1487 – †1555), as a leader of the so-called nobles' party active in Royal Prussia since 1536, Kostka stood in opposition to most of the members of the Council of Royal Prussia, who wanted to maintain the autonomy of the province and a "balance of power" in terms of governance. The tension between the Prussian Subtreasurer and the Council had been increasing since the Diet in Graudenz (Grudziądz) in 1533. Kostka, connected with the royal court since his youth, was sent to Graudenz as the King's deputy and, contrary to custom, decided to take part in the proceedings. In response to such a step, the Council members stopped the meeting. Kostka accused them of hostility towards the Poles and intervened on this matter at the court. In the absence of the then Bishop of Ermland (Mauritius Ferber) it was Dantiscus who chaired the Graudenz Diet. The incident badly harmed his future relationships with Kostka; 1531-1555 Treasurer of the Prussian lands and Treasurer of Marienburg (Malbork); 1544-1545 Castellan of Elbing (Elbląg), 1545-1546 Castellan of Kulm (Chełmno); 1546-1549 Vice-Voivode of Kulm; 1546-1551 Voivode of Pomerania; 1551-1555 Voivode of Kulm (PSB 14, p. 356; Urzędnicy 5/2, p. 216; MAŁŁEK 1976, p. 119-123)⌊thesaurario nostroStanisław Kostka (*1487 – †1555), as a leader of the so-called nobles' party active in Royal Prussia since 1536, Kostka stood in opposition to most of the members of the Council of Royal Prussia, who wanted to maintain the autonomy of the province and a "balance of power" in terms of governance. The tension between the Prussian Subtreasurer and the Council had been increasing since the Diet in Graudenz (Grudziądz) in 1533. Kostka, connected with the royal court since his youth, was sent to Graudenz as the King's deputy and, contrary to custom, decided to take part in the proceedings. In response to such a step, the Council members stopped the meeting. Kostka accused them of hostility towards the Poles and intervened on this matter at the court. In the absence of the then Bishop of Ermland (Mauritius Ferber) it was Dantiscus who chaired the Graudenz Diet. The incident badly harmed his future relationships with Kostka; 1531-1555 Treasurer of the Prussian lands and Treasurer of Marienburg (Malbork); 1544-1545 Castellan of Elbing (Elbląg), 1545-1546 Castellan of Kulm (Chełmno); 1546-1549 Vice-Voivode of Kulm; 1546-1551 Voivode of Pomerania; 1551-1555 Voivode of Kulm (PSB 14, p. 356; Urzędnicy 5/2, p. 216; MAŁŁEK 1976, p. 119-123)⌋ reponendas decernatis. Valorem autem et aestimationem floreni Ungaricalis, cui in auro additum non sit, secundum dispositionem statuti regni nostri sententia vestra declaretis. Ceterum mille quadringenti et duodecim Ungaricales aurei in litteris descripti in auro solvi debent. Ita enim in redemptione bonorum nostrorum regalium ubique in dicionibus nostris observari solitum est, sicuti statuto regni exprimitur. 
BNW, BOZ, 953, f. 142v Secundum quod Strenuitates Vestrae se quoque gerent et conservabunt hidden by binding⌈[t]t hidden by binding⌉. Proventus quoque ab incolis dictarum villarum retentos hidden by binding⌈[os]os hidden by binding⌉ et pro festo Purificationis proxime venturo debitos domino hidden by binding⌈[domino]domino hidden by binding⌉ Tidemanno dandos et solvendos adiudicabitis, quibus ei hidden by binding⌈[i]i hidden by binding⌉ donavimus et donamus per praesentes; sic et non aliter hidden by binding⌈[liter]liter hidden by binding⌉ pro officio suo et gratia nostra Strenuitates Vestrae facturae.
BNW, BOZ, 953, f. 142r
BNW, BOZ, 953, f. 142v Secundum quod Strenuitates Vestrae se quoque gerent et conservabunt hidden by binding⌈[t]t hidden by binding⌉. Proventus quoque ab incolis dictarum villarum retentos hidden by binding⌈[os]os hidden by binding⌉ et pro festo Purificationis proxime venturo debitos domino hidden by binding⌈[domino]domino hidden by binding⌉ Tidemanno dandos et solvendos adiudicabitis, quibus ei hidden by binding⌈[i]i hidden by binding⌉ donavimus et donamus per praesentes; sic et non aliter hidden by binding⌈[liter]liter hidden by binding⌉ pro officio suo et gratia nostra Strenuitates Vestrae facturae.