Letter #2472
[Ioannes DANTISCUS] to UNKNOWN [Ermland (Warmia) Canon]Heilsberg (Lidzbark), 1541-07-26
English register:
The day before, Dantiscus received both a messenger from the addressee and a letter from Dantiscus’ nephew Kaspar [Hannau] in Rome, containing the awaited materials. Dantiscus asks the addressee to offer an opinion on them.
He considers the presence of the addressee at the boundary revision meeting indispensable, as he has more experience than Georg [Donner? Preucken?]. Dantiscus would be very pleased if the addressee, through his brother or others, could persuade the duke [Albrecht von Hohenzollern] to abandon this matter. Dantiscus is aware of the consequences to which this revision will lead.
He encloses a copy of his response to Dietrich [von Rheden’s] letter. He leaves it to the addressee’s judgment whether to send Dietrich von Rheden the royal mandates and the king’s letters to the pope [Paul III] and the cardinal [Antonio Pucci]. In Dantiscus’s opinion, they would cause apprehension rather than give him courage.
He asks that the remaining letters addressed to the Ermland (Warmia) canons be forwarded to them.
In a postscript, he mentions that the previous day he received the enclosed news. He also notes that the addressee has not replied to him regarding the eels.
Manuscript sources:
Auxiliary sources:
| ||||||
Text & apparatus & commentary Plain text Text & commentary Text & apparatus
Commodum heri puer Dominationis Vestrae appulit, cum mihi cf.
Ad lustrandos limites praesentia Dominationis Vestrae est necessaria, quae iis in rebus plus, quam dominus Georgius, versata est. Si posset vel per fratrem, aut quoscumque alios efficere, ut ab hoc coepto dominus
Venerabili domino
Quae feliciter valeat paper damaged⌈[aleat]aleat paper damaged⌉.
Ex paper damaged⌈[Ex]Ex paper damaged⌉
Postscript:
Nova inclusa heri accepi. De anguillis Dominatio Vestra non rescripsit. Eas non nisi pretio hab[...] paper damaged⌈[...][...] paper damaged⌉.
BCz, 245, p. 283