Letter #1588
[Ioannes DANTISCUS] to [Georg von BAYSEN (BAŻYŃSKI)]Löbau (Lubawa), 1537-03-12
English register: Dantiscus is replying to three letters from Bażyński. The tense atmosphere at the royal court makes it impossible for Dantiscus to attend to the matters that Bażyński entrusted to him in Cracow; they will have to wait for better times. The place and time of the upcoming assembly depend on Maurycy Ferber’s decision; his poor health will probably not allow him to participate in the assembly, unless it is held in Malbork. During Dantiscus’ stay in Cracow, the Płock bishop (Jan Chojeński) proposed Toruń as the venue for the assembly, for the convenience of the royal commissioners. If, however, Ferber decides to come to Malbork, it would be best not to have the sessions elsewhere, as Ferber’s absence means less strength in the voting. If Ferber is unable to come, he will send two Warmia canons in his place. Dantiscus will let Bażyński know as soon as a decision is reached. Dantiscus complains about the financial and moral losses he has sustained in connection with his being at the Diet in Cracow, and about the rebuke given him by his friend (Maurycy Ferber) for complaining. Dantiscus asks Bażyński to reprimand parish priest Ioannes (Staer), who – leaving the parish – has been taking or selling movable property belonging to the parish without the bishop’s knowledge. News of the Turkish threat has been coming from Hungary and the Austrian borderland.
Manuscript sources:
Prints:
|
Text & apparatus & commentaryPlain textText & commentaryText & apparatus
Magnifice Domine, Amice carissime et honorande. Salutem et omnem felicitatem.
Accepi a Magnificentia Vestra
Ea, quae Magnificentia Vestra scripsit de loco et tempore
Velim conqueri ut amico, verum, ne mihi accidat ut pauloante ab amico[3], vereor, cui cum graves a me duobus iam annis sese subsequentibus expensas pro patria factas nihil petens vel sperans descripsissem, responsum fuit Germanico adagio: “Was dw kanst das thw”[4]. Adversarii mei dicunt, quod
Fuit 1537-03-11⌊heri1537-03-11⌋ apud me
Ex
[2 ] The votes will be less numerous because Ferber’s possible representatives will not have the right to vote in his name. Ferber’s health in fact did make it impossible for himto take part in the assembly. His representatives were Warmia canons
[3 ] Maurycy Ferber had reprimanded Dantiscus for complaining about the expenses and hardships connected with his participation in the 1536/37 Diet (see cf.
[4 ] Old German: Was du kannst, das tu (Eng. Do what you can )
[5 ] Dantiscus quots here the oration of Marcus Tullius Cicero Pro Sulla, erroneously under the title of another of his orations – Pro Plancio
[6 ] At the time, Ioannes Staer was moving from the parish in Groedsch(?) to the parish of Schoneck(?) (cf. cf.