Visits: 412
» CORPUS of Ioannes Dantiscus' Texts & Correspondence
Copyright © Laboratory for Source Editing and Digital Humanities AL UW

All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording or any other information storage and retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the publisher.

Person or Institution #763
Jan KUNICKI

Jan Kunicki (Jan Cunitzky), probably identical to Jan Kunicki, royal scribe (at least in 1525) and parish priest in Niemczyna (AT 17, p. 342, footnote 1; WOLFF 1883, p. 265)

Correspondence between Dantiscus and Jan KUNICKI

List Database Full text

Results found: 3

preserved: 1 + lost: 2

1IDL 6392     Ioannes DANTISCUS to Jan KUNICKI, before 1547-05-30 Letter lost

Letter lost, reconstructed on the basis of IDL 3098, not entire
2IDL 6391     Jan KUNICKI to Ioannes DANTISCUS, before 1547-05-30 Letter lost

Letter lost, mentioned in IDL 3098
3IDL 3098 [Ioannes DANTISCUS] to Jan KUNICKI, Heilsberg (Lidzbark Warmiński), 1547-05-30


Manuscript sources:
1rough draft in Latin, in secretary's hand, AAWO, AB, D. 70, f. 272r-v

Auxiliary sources:
1register in German, 20th-century, B. PAU-PAN, 8250 (TK 12), f. 394

 

Text & apparatus & commentaryPlain textText & commentaryText & apparatus

 

Gratae nobis fuerunt cf. Jan KUNICKI to Ioannes DANTISCUS before 1547-05-30, CIDTC IDL 6391, letter lost⌊Dominationis Vestrae litteraecf. Jan KUNICKI to Ioannes DANTISCUS before 1547-05-30, CIDTC IDL 6391, letter lost⌋, quibus ad nostra cf. Ioannes DANTISCUS to Jan KUNICKI before 1547-05-30, CIDTC IDL 6392, letter lost⌊nostriscf. Ioannes DANTISCUS to Jan KUNICKI before 1547-05-30, CIDTC IDL 6392, letter lost⌋ respondit super nec erat et nobis tantas gratias agit, quod facere non erat necessarium, eo quod Dominationem Vestram nostris litteris invisimus et re superinscribed in place of crossed-out in⌈inrere superinscribed in place of crossed-out in⌉quisivi superinscribed⌈vivi superinscribed⌉mus. AAWO, AB, D. 70, f. 272v Acceptum tamen id nobis fuit et Dominationi Vestrae econtra multas superinscribed in place of crossed-out magnas⌈magnas multas multas superinscribed in place of crossed-out magnas⌉ agimus gratias, quod nostras litteras g acceptas habuit et illis respondere non gravata sit, nostroque nomine pro inquirendo nano tantam operam impendit. Quam et superinscribed⌈etet superinscribed⌉ plurimum rogamus Qui si adhuc alicubi superinscribed⌈alicubialicubi superinscribed⌉ haberi poterit, rogamus plurimum Dominationem Vestram, velit in eo nobis gratificari et talem, qui apud aptus nobis superinscribed⌈nobisnobis superinscribed⌉ et ex sententia nostra erit, nobis transmittere. Si vicissim Dominationi Vestrae aliqua re vobis on the margin⌈aliqua re vobisaliqua re vobis on the margin⌉ vobis respondere superinscribed in place of crossed-out prodesse⌈prodesse vobis(!) respondere vobis respondere superinscribed in place of crossed-out prodesse⌉[2] poterimus, experietur illa nos semper paratissimum. Quam in the Dantiscus hand, in next line in place of crossed-out Dominationem Vestram⌈Dominationem Vestram superinscribed in place of crossed-out Quam⌈QuamDominationem VestramDominationem Vestram superinscribed in place of crossed-out Quam⌉ Quam Quam in the Dantiscus hand, in next line in place of crossed-out Dominationem Vestram⌉ bene et feliciter valere optamus.