Letter #1742
[Ioannes DANTISCUS] to [Jan CHOJEŃSKI]Graudenz (Grudziądz), 1537-10-05
English register: Dantiscus expresses his conviction that Chojeński is a mainstay for him in the matters about which he wrote to him extensively in the letter of October 1 (letter CEID 1.1, No. 48, p. 262-269 IDL 1737). He informed him about the sessions of the Prussian assembly in the brief letter sent through Mikołaj Nipszyc (letter CEID CEID 1.1, No. 51, p. 275 IDL 1740). The present letter serves as authorization for Mikołaj Nipszyc as the messenger who will orally present an urgent matter of state importance at the royal court on behalf of the Prussian Council. Dantiscus asks Chojeński to help Nipszyc reach the king and present the problem. Nipszyc has not been supplied with credentials with the seal of the Prussian Council because the envoys from Elbląg, whose councilors are traditional keepers of the seal, have still not reached the assembly. These credentials, addressed to Chojeński (CEID appendix II ID 163 ) and to the king (CEID appendix I ID 162), will be sent at a later date.
Manuscript sources:
Auxiliary sources:
Prints:
|
Text & apparatus & commentaryPlain textText & commentaryText & apparatus
Reverendissime in Christo Pater et Domine, Domine mi colendissime. Salutem et mei commendationem plurimam.
Pauloante, hoc est prima die huius mensis, hinc Dominationi Vestrae Reverendissimae de rebus meis copiose cf.
Ex
[1 ] The seal of Royal Prussia was used to seal important documents and deeds issued by the Prussian Council and the Prussian general assemblies. Until 1613, the former land seal of the governor of Prussia (this office was in existence in the years 1456-80) was used as the seal of Royal Prussia. The seal was kept at the Elbląg town hall, in the care of the local town council. It was delivered to the assemblies by the Elbląg delegates, and sealing of documents was performed in their quarters. If the Elbląg delegation did not show up at an assembly, the seal of one of the councilors was used, confirmed by a handwritten signature. (cf. cf. GERLACH p. 114-118, 130-131 ⌊Gerlach, p. 114-118, 130-131cf. GERLACH p. 114-118, 130-131 ⌋. Obviously, such confirmation was insufficient for the matter discussed in this letter
[2 ] The matter that Nipszyc was to report to the king and Chojeński concerned the summoning of Gdańsk castellan Achatius Cema by the Brandenburg elector to secret talks in
Berlin. The Prussian Council’s letters to Chojeński and Sigismund I on
this matter, which Nipszyc was to take, were edited by Dantiscus. Both rough copies – Dantiscus’ autographs – are kept at BCz, 244, p.270 (cf.