Letter #3237
[Ioannes DANTISCUS] to Samuel MACIEJOWSKIHeilsberg (Lidzbark), 1547-10-25
English register:
Peter Schissenteuber, a burgher from Elbing (Elbląg), has obtained a lawsuit summons for the town council of Elbing to appear before a royal court. In Dantiscus’ opinion, the matter must have been misrepresented, for otherwise the addressee would have easily dismissed it. Last year at the diet of Royal Prussia in Graudenz (Grudziądz), the Prussian councillors examined the case and delivered a verdict in favour of the town council of Elbing. Schissenteuber agreed to accept the case as being duly adjudicated and expressed no desire to appeal, despite being advised of such a possibility. Reportedly, it was only later, in the presence of a notary and witnesses, that he appealed to the king. He notified neither the councillors nor the opposing party in the lawsuit of the appeal. Nevertheless, under the pretext of this appeal, he obtained the said royal summons.
To avoid being judged in absentia, the city council has sent a secretary to the royal court. Furthermore, they have requested that Dantiscus, who is familiar with the course of the case, send this letter, so that the addressee, being better informed, might support them in their efforts to be released from the legal proceedings by the king.
He requests, therefore, that the addressee obtain the king’s consent that such appeals as are contrary to royal statutes and brought outside the regular procedure in order to avoid the due fees, should not be permitted. Appeals lodged solely before a notary and witnesses should only be admissible if councillors prevent an appeal from being filed. Otherwise, this undermines the dignity of the judiciary and exposes the parties to costs in matters which have already been adjudicated.
Manuscript sources:
Auxiliary sources:
| ||||||
Text & apparatus & commentary Plain text Text & commentary Text & apparatus
Domino
Reverendissime in Christo etc.
Obtinuit contra spectabilem
AAWO, AB, D. 70, f. 317v et decisa haec caus haec causa coram dominis
Ne itaque contumaces reputarentur
Nunc hoc est inventum. Et cum hoc novum sit invent inventum eorum hominum, qui contra constitutiones regias a S
Cui me una cum dicto
Dat(ae) or Dat(um)⌈Dat(ae)Dat(ae) or Dat(um)⌉